Qodo
Code integrity platform with AI test generation and PR review.
Our editorial assessment, based on the public sources listed below. Last reviewed .
- Task rank
- #8
- Tier
- A
- Score
- 82.1
Strengths
- Strong automated test generation
- Integrates PR review and code analysis
- Works across popular IDEs and Git platforms
Considerations
- Narrower autocomplete than general assistants
- Test focus is less useful for quick prototyping
Price
Free tier; Teams from $19/user/mo
Shown for reference — price is not part of the score.
Score breakdown
- Performance
- 82.0
- 55% of score
- Reputation
- 80.0
- 35% of score
- Recency
- 90.0
- 10% of score
The overall score combines these sub-scores using the weights shown. How we score →
Verification status
Each field carries its own re-verification date. Amber means older than 90 days — treat those figures as stale until re-checked.
- Pricing
- Benchmark
- Reputation
- Feature list
Checked against the sources listed below.
Sources
- Qodo raises $70M for code verification (TechCrunch, 2026-03-30) (opens in a new tab)Accessed:
- Qodo 2026 State of AI Code Quality Report (GlobeNewswire, 2026-09-23) (opens in a new tab)Accessed:
- Qodo reviews (G2) (opens in a new tab)Accessed:
- Qodo reviews & ratings (Gartner Peer Insights) (opens in a new tab)Accessed:
- Awesome AI Coding (GitHub) (opens in a new tab)Accessed:
Show 3 more sources
Alternatives in Coding Assistant
- #1Claude CodeSScore 94.9Anthropic's agentic coding tool that handles bug fixes, tests and refactors from the terminal, IDE, desktop app or web.
- #2CursorSScore 93.7AI coding agent and VS Code-based editor with autonomous and cloud agents, Tab completion, a CLI and Bugbot code review across multiple models.
- #7Gemini CLIAScore 82.3Open-source terminal coding agent with a generous free tier and large context window.