Maze
AI-assisted user research and testing platform that turns product tests into UX insights.
Our editorial assessment, based on the public sources listed below. Last reviewed .
- Task rank
- #18
- Tier
- A
- Score
- 73.6
Strengths
- Automates analysis of unmoderated user tests into readable insight summaries.
- Integrates with Figma so prototypes can be tested before any code is written.
- Free tier available for small teams starting continuous research.
Considerations
- Does not generate interfaces itself — it validates designs made elsewhere.
- Paid plans start around $50/month, steep for solo designers.
Price
Free tier; paid plans start around $50/month
Shown for reference — price is not part of the score.
Score breakdown
- Performance
- 73.0
- 55% of score
- Reputation
- 71.0
- 35% of score
- Recency
- 86.0
- 10% of score
The overall score combines these sub-scores using the weights shown. How we score →
Verification status
Each field carries its own re-verification date. Amber means older than 90 days — treat those figures as stale until re-checked.
- Pricing
- Benchmark
- Reputation
- Feature list
Checked against the sources listed below.
Sources
Alternatives in UI / UX Design
- #1Figma MakeSScore 89.5An AI tool for designers to generate designs and code directly within the Figma ecosystem.
- #2Google StitchSScore 87.4Google's AI UI tool (formerly Galileo AI) that turns prompts and images into UI designs with Figma and code export.
- #17AnimaAScore 73.9Turns Figma designs into production-ready React, Vue, and HTML code.