Meta
Muse Wonder
Meta's Muse reasoning model (October 2026) for complex software engineering and long-horizon agent work, offered through the Meta Model API.
Our editorial assessment, based on the public sources listed below. Last reviewed .
- Overall rank
- #9
- Tier
- S
- Score
- 87.7
- Main category
- Overall
Strengths
- Built for multi-file changes in real repositories, sub-agent delegation and parallel tool calls
- 1M-token context with text, image, speech and video input
- Self-serve access via the Meta Model API and Muse Code plans, including a higher-effort Wonder Full option
Considerations
- Meta labels the model as a preview, so behavior and pricing may change
- Weights are proprietary, unlike Meta's earlier Llama releases
- Fewer API providers than established frontier models
Price
API about $4 input / $20 output per 1M tokens (Meta Model API preview, per Artificial Analysis)
Shown for reference — price is not part of the score.
Score breakdown
- Performance
- 92.0
- 55% of score
- Reputation
- 78.0
- 35% of score
- Recency
- 98.0
- 10% of score
The overall score combines these sub-scores using the weights shown. How we score →
Verification status
Each field carries its own re-verification date. Amber means older than 90 days — treat those figures as stale until re-checked.
- Pricing
- Benchmark
- Reputation
- Feature list
- source ↗
Checked against the sources listed below.
Sources
Similar models
- Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic#7 · Tier S · Score 91.1Compare
- Claude Opus 5Anthropic#8 · Tier S · Score 88.0Compare
- Grok 4.7xAI#11 · Tier S · Score 87.1Compare
- Claude Fable 5Anthropic#12 · Tier S · Score 87.0Compare