Maze
AI-assisted user research and testing platform that turns product tests into UX insights.
Our editorial assessment, based on the public sources listed below. Last reviewed .
- Task rank
- #15
- Tier
- A
- Score
- 77.4
Strengths
- Automates analysis of unmoderated user tests into readable insight summaries.
- Integrates with Figma so prototypes can be tested before any code is written.
- Free tier available for small teams starting continuous research.
Considerations
- Does not generate interfaces itself — it validates designs made elsewhere.
- Paid plans start around $50/month, steep for solo designers.
Price
Free tier; paid plans start around $50/month
Shown for reference — price is not part of the score.
Score breakdown
- Performance
- 75.0
- 55% of score
- Reputation
- 78.0
- 35% of score
- Recency
- 88.0
- 10% of score
The overall score combines these sub-scores using the weights shown. How we score →
Verification status
Each field carries its own re-verification date. Amber means older than 90 days — treat those figures as stale until re-checked.
- Pricing
- Benchmark
- Reputation
- Feature list
Checked against the sources listed below.
Sources
- G2: Maze reviews (opens in a new tab)Accessed:
- Entropik: Decode vs Maze AI Moderator (opens in a new tab)Accessed:
- Maze Newsroom (opens in a new tab)Accessed:
- maze.co (opens in a new tab)Accessed:
- Best AI UX Tools 2026 (opens in a new tab)Accessed:
Show 2 more sources
Alternatives in Research / Search
- #1PerplexitySScore 89.7Conversational search engine that provides cited answers by synthesizing real-time web and academic data.
- #2GeminiSScore 88.8A multimodal AI model with a large context window for processing datasets, PDFs, and video.
- #14UndermindAScore 77.5Deep literature search agent that runs a long, transparent scan of the paper record.