Stark
Figma-native accessibility checks that flag WCAG contrast and color-vision issues while you design.
Our editorial assessment, based on the public sources listed below. Last reviewed .
- Task rank
- #20
- Tier
- A
- Score
- 72.4
Strengths
- Runs WCAG contrast and color-blindness checks directly inside Figma
- Catches accessibility problems before developer handoff
- Free tier covers individual designers
Considerations
- Does not replace a manual accessibility audit
- Scoped to accessibility only, not UI generation
Price
Free tier; Pro from about $10 per seat/month
Shown for reference — price is not part of the score.
Score breakdown
- Performance
- 72.0
- 55% of score
- Reputation
- 68.0
- 35% of score
- Recency
- 90.0
- 10% of score
The overall score combines these sub-scores using the weights shown. How we score →
Verification status
Each field carries its own re-verification date. Amber means older than 90 days — treat those figures as stale until re-checked.
- Pricing
- Benchmark
- Reputation
- Feature list
Checked against the sources listed below.
Sources
Alternatives in UI / UX Design
- #1Figma MakeSScore 89.5An AI tool for designers to generate designs and code directly within the Figma ecosystem.
- #2Google StitchSScore 87.4Google's AI UI tool (formerly Galileo AI) that turns prompts and images into UI designs with Figma and code export.
- #19LocofyAScore 72.6Converts Figma designs into multi-framework front-end code.