LLMrefs
Tracks how often a brand appears in AI search answers and which sources those answers cite.
Our editorial assessment, based on the public sources listed below. Last reviewed .
- Task rank
- #32
- Tier
- B
- Score
- 66.0
Strengths
- Built for answer-engine visibility rather than classic blue-link rankings
- Keyword-level tracking of how models surface and cite brands
- Addresses zero-click search where CTR metrics stop working
Considerations
- Public pricing details are not clearly published
- Narrow scope — not a replacement for a full SEO suite
- Young category with little independent benchmarking so far
Price
Subscription plans; check the vendor pricing page
Shown for reference — price is not part of the score.
Score breakdown
- Performance
- 68.0
- 55% of score
- Reputation
- 60.0
- 35% of score
- Recency
- 76.0
- 10% of score
The overall score combines these sub-scores using the weights shown. How we score →
Verification status
Each field carries its own re-verification date. Amber means older than 90 days — treat those figures as stale until re-checked.
- Pricing
- Benchmark
- Reputation
- Feature list
Checked against the sources listed below.
Sources
Alternatives in Marketing / Ad Copy
- #1HubSpot AISScore 85.6AI features layered across HubSpot's marketing hub: email copy suggestions, lead scoring, send-time optimization, and content recommendations.
- #2JasperAScore 84.4Enterprise-grade AI platform built to help marketing teams scale on-brand content production.
- #31Headline StudioBScore 67.3Headline scoring and AI headline suggestions for blogs, email, social and ads.