Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic's faster, lower-cost Claude 5.5 model for coding, agents, and everyday knowledge work.
Our editorial assessment, based on the public sources listed below. Last reviewed .
- Overall rank
- #3
- Tier
- S
- Score
- 92.9
- Main category
- Coding
Strengths
- Ranks close behind Claude Opus 5.5 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
- Large Terminal-Bench 4.0 gain over Sonnet 5, per Anthropic
- Over 30% faster output than Sonnet 5 at unchanged $2/$10 per 1M token pricing
Considerations
- Anthropic positions it for well-scoped everyday tasks; Opus 5.5 remains ahead on the hardest work
- Released September 28, 2026; long-run independent benchmarks are still maturing
Price
$2 input / $10 output per 1M tokens (API); cache reads $0.20 per 1M
Shown for reference — price is not part of the score.
Score breakdown
- Performance
- 95.0
- 55% of score
- Reputation
- 88.0
- 35% of score
- Recency
- 98.0
- 10% of score
The overall score combines these sub-scores using the weights shown. How we score →
Verification status
Each field carries its own re-verification date. Amber means older than 90 days — treat those figures as stale until re-checked.
- Pricing
- Benchmark
- Reputation
- Feature list
Checked against the sources listed below.
Sources
- Artificial Analysis — Claude Sonnet 5.5 (opens in a new tab)Accessed:
- SiliconANGLE — Anthropic debuts Claude Sonnet 5.5 (opens in a new tab)Accessed:
- Artificial Analysis — Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5 (opens in a new tab)Accessed:
- Anthropic — Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5 (opens in a new tab)Accessed:
- Artificial Analysis — LLM Leaderboard (opens in a new tab)Accessed:
Show 2 more sources
Similar models
- GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI#5 · Tier S · Score 91.8Compare
- GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI#10 · Tier S · Score 87.3Compare
- GPT-6 SolOpenAI#15 · Tier S · Score 86.1Compare
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek#17 · Tier S · Score 85.7Compare